News & Publications

“Klee on the Aftermath of Stern v. Marshall: An Analysis of the Court's Ruling”

Kenneth N. Klee
LexisNexis Emerging Issues, 2012 Emerging Issues 6404 (June 9, 2012)
2012

In this article, Professor Klee examines the developing case law in the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling in Stern v. Marshall, in which the Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C) is unconstitutional because it gives non-Article III judges the power to render final judgments on common law compulsory counterclaims that are not necessarily resolved in the process of allowing or disallowing the defendant's proof of claim.